*How do we move from promising AI tools to practical, scalable GGB
literature curation?*
Join us on *Wednesday, November 4* for a webinar with Olivia Haley (USDA),
Kapeel Chougule (CSHL), and Laura Tibbs-Cortes (USDA) from the AgBioData
NLP for Biocuration Working Group on the *lessons learned from working with
Textpresso, plant papers and genes*.
Since its formation in March 2025, the NLP for Biocuration Working Group
has been evaluating AI-assisted tools and approaches to help scale
literature curation across agricultural genomics databases. The group has
explored tools including Textpresso, BioBERT, Elicit, and OntoGPT,
developed shared benchmarking practices, and coordinated efforts toward a
Textpresso proof of concept tailored to agricultural species.
As part of the monthly AgBioData Webinar Series
<https://www.agbiodata.org/webinars>, Olivia, Kapeel, and Laura will share
lessons learned from evaluating these tools, benchmarking AI-assisted
literature workflows, and building shared infrastructure to support
literature curation across the agricultural genomics community. The
presentation will also introduce the AgBioData implementation of
Textpresso, including its graphical user interface (GUI), API, and
command-line tools.
Wednesday, November 4
| 1P ET | 12P CT | 11A MT | 10A PT |
Find your local time here
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AgBioData+Nov+202…>.
Note that it will be Standard Time in the United States (no longer daylight
saving time).
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82038356125?pwd=YVFMRElMdEpHZmtObXFvZlA4QVFXQT09
Meeting ID: 820 3835 6125
Passcode: 160683
*N**LP4Biocuration: Advancing FAIR, AI-Assisted Literature Curation Across
the AgBioData Consortium The AgBioData*
The NLP4Biocuration Working Group was formed in March 2025 to evaluate,
prototype, and coordinate the integration of natural-language-processing
(NLP) and large language model (LLM) tools to support scalable,
ontology-driven literature curation across agricultural genomics databases.
This effort is conducted under the umbrella of the AgBioData Consortium and
is supported by the *NSF Research Coordination Network award #2126334*
<https://www.agbiodata.org/projects/nsf-rcn>, a shared community resource
initiative that promotes interoperable informatics solutions. Over the past
eight months, working group members performed a coordinated assessment of
AI-assisted literature tools, developed shared benchmarking practices, and
explored infrastructure options for cross-database deployment. Tools
evaluated include BioBERT, Elicit, Textpresso, OntoGPT, and early
agentic-AI frameworks, with attention to their utility for named entity
recognition, relationship extraction, summarization, and paper
prioritization for plant and crop species. Several members implemented
pilot pipelines comparing AI-generated literature sets with manually
curated datasets, providing practical insights into recall, precision, and
model behavior within agriculture-specific contexts. To facilitate shared
learning and reproducibility, the group established a structured "tool
review" framework and a community repository of test cases, datasets, and
documented workflows. A major milestone is the ongoing organization of a
Textpresso proof-of-concept deployment tailored for agricultural species.
Participating AgBioData resources, including SorghumBase, MaizeGDB, GDR,
SoyBase, GrainGenes, and others, are assembling FAIR-compliant gene lists,
entity vocabularies, and open-access corpora, and are coordinating with the
Alliance of Genome Resources team on compute requirements for a shared
AWS-based test environment. In parallel, the group distributed a survey
across AgBioData member databases to capture literature volume, workflows,
AI adoption, and technical barriers; survey findings are guiding both a
manuscript currently in development and continued infrastructure planning.
Aligned with FAIR principles, the AgBioData consortium advances sustainable
informatics infrastructure. By aligning NLP4Biocuration activities with
these principles, the working group is helping establish sustainable
informatics infrastructure and analytics-driven methods that benefit the
entire agricultural genomics community.
This presentation will cover the AgBioData implementation of Textpresso,
including the GUI and programmatic access by API and command line tools.
See also this news blog <https://www.agbiodata.org/node/654>.
Marcela
--
Marcela Karey Tello-Ruiz, PhD
AgBioData Program Manager
https://www.agbiodata.org/
Phoenix Bioinformatics
[image: :seedling:] *What if the answer isn’t in a database—but in the
connections between databases?*
Join us on *Wednesday, October 7* for a webinar with Ehsan Estaji of the
Umeå Plant Science Centre, Sweden:
[image: :link:] Trapped knowledge in the AI-agent era: how PlantGraph turns
multi-database questions into one traversal you can check
PlantGraph connects plant data across the transcriptome, epigenome,
regulome, and proteome, helping researchers turn complex, multi-database
questions into one connected, traceable query.
As part of the monthly AgBioData Webinar Series
<https://www.agbiodata.org/webinars>, Ehsan will show how this approach can
help AI agents retrieve evidence more reliably—and how we can check whether
AI-generated answers actually stay grounded in that evidence.
Wednesday, October 7
| 1P ET | 12P CT | 11A MT | 10A PT |
Find your local time here
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AgBioData+Oct+202…>
.
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82038356125?pwd=YVFMRElMdEpHZmtObXFvZlA4QVFXQT09
Meeting ID: 820 3835 6125
Passcode: 160683
Title: Trapped knowledge in the AI-agent era: how PlantGraph turns
multi-database questions into one traversal you can check
Abstract: A real biological question is rarely a record — it is a path.
“Which salt-responsive genes also carry a promoter methylation change, a
transcription-factor binding site, and a known phosphosite?” has no home
database: the answer exists only as a traversal across four of them. This
is why so much of what we collectively know sits trapped. Not because the
facts are missing — they are curated, somewhere — but because the
connections between them were never stored anywhere. Researchers rebuild
those connections by hand, one question at a time, and lose them the moment
they close the tabs.
Capable AI agents raise the cost of that fragmentation rather than
resolving it. An agent handed a set of endpoints has to plan the join
itself, guessing identifiers and directions at every hop, and every hop is
an opportunity to improvise. In our own benchmarking, giving a strong model
tools and API access over fragmented sources did not reliably fix
retrieval; connecting the data first, and retrieving over it
deterministically, did.
PlantGraph (plantgraph.se) integrates community plant resources into one
connected knowledge graph and separates two jobs that agents usually
conflate: the graph retrieves the evidence, the language model only writes
over it. A multi-database question becomes a single traversal — and because
that traversal actually ran, every claim can be followed back to the query
that produced it and the source record that curated it.
I will walk through questions spanning transcriptome, epigenome, regulome
and proteome resolving in one step, how we measure when the generated
narration drifts from the retrieved evidence, and where the approach still
fails. PlantGraph <https://plantgraph.se/> is not a replacement for the
databases it draws on — it stands on them, and every resource that connects
makes the rest worth more.
See also this news blog <https://www.agbiodata.org/node/652>.
Marcela
--
Marcela Karey Tello-Ruiz, PhD
AgBioData Program Manager
https://www.agbiodata.org/
Phoenix Bioinformatics